On 19 March 2017 at 19:30, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote:
> On March 19, 2017 9:33:02 AM Grazvydas Ignotas <nota...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Grazvydas,
>>>
>>> On 17 March 2017 at 22:05, Grazvydas Ignotas <nota...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Fixes build without vulkan.h installed in system header locations:
>>>> CC vulkan/vulkan_libvulkan_intel_la-anv_gem.lo
>>>> In file included from vulkan/anv_private.h:66:0,
>>>> from vulkan/anv_gem.c:31:
>>>> /opt/xorg/include/vulkan/vulkan_intel.h:27:20: fatal error: vulkan.h:
>>>> No such file or directory
>>>>
>>> Not sure the above makes sense I'm afraid. VULKAN_CPPFLAGS already
>>> includes AM_CPPFLAGS which has the include.
>>>
>>> I've even hacked up my system [sudo mv
>>> /usr/include/vulkan/vulkan.h{,1} and things build fine w/o your patch.
>>
>>
>> Maybe you forgot --with-vulkan-drivers=intel for this test?
>>
>> Anyway the problem is without my patch my includes look like this:
>> ... -I/opt/xorg/include -I/opt/xorg/include/libdrm -I../../include ...
>>
Grazvydas, c'mon man seriously ? If your compiler does not fall-back
and look into the other -I locations for the said header it's just
broken ;-(
Or maybe it does but the ifndef guard in vulkan.h kicks in - quick
check is to grep your whole system for "VULKAN_H_"
>> With that, it's picking the earlier installed
>> /opt/xorg/include/vulkan/vulkan_intel.h instead of
>> ../../include/vulkan/vulkan_intel.h , and that one has:
>
>
> We should probably make sure that mesa includes come before includes from
> other random projects. That said, why is xorg packaging Vulkan headers?
> And why is *anyone* packaging vulkan_intel.h???
>
Having local vs local vulkan.h should not lead to any difference
really. That aside - people tend to have "local" xorg (and friends)
builds in /opt/xorg rather than overwriting the files provided by
their distribution.
Which is the saner option, even if [cough] some devs intentionally ignore it ;-)
That aside - can we get the Intel extension ratified and included in
upstream [vulkan.h] hence we can drop the vulkan_intel.h ?
Alternatively if there are no users for it we can drop the header and
all the related code. Please ?
Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
