On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4 March 2017 at 22:43, Vinson Lee <v...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 4 March 2017 at 22:13, Vinson Lee <v...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
>>>> Fixes: 85a9b1b562b6 ("util/disk_cache: compress individual cache entries")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vinson Lee <v...@freedesktop.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> configure.ac | 3 +--
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>>>> index 943bc05adcd6..3526849b6dd2 100644
>>>> --- a/configure.ac
>>>> +++ b/configure.ac
>>>> @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ dnl See if posix_memalign is available
>>>> AC_CHECK_FUNC([posix_memalign], [DEFINES="$DEFINES
>>>> -DHAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN"])
>>>>
>>>> dnl Check for zlib
>>>> -PKG_CHECK_MODULES([ZLIB], [zlib >= $ZLIB_REQUIRED])
>>>> +PKG_CHECK_MODULES([ZLIB], [zlib >= $ZLIB_REQUIRED], [DEFINES="$DEFINES
>>>> -DENABLE_SHADER_CACHE"], [:])
>>>>
>>> Why - is it causing breakage or any system ?
>>>
>>> Afaict we really want to have this tested thoroughly and silently
>>> disabling it is a very bad idea.
>>>
>>> -Emil
>>
>> Older distros have a zlib older than 1.2.8.
>
> Tim I think you had something in mind about such cases, hehe ;-)
>
> But seriously, seems like enterprise Linuxes are stuck with very old ones:
> RHEL4 - 1.2.1
> RHEL 5/6 - 1.2.3
> SLES 10/11 - 1.2.3
>
> Tim, I'll leave the rest to you - how/worth using third party package,
> dropping to 1.2.3 or other ?
> I'm leaning towards 1.2.3, unless there's some serious down sides with it.
>
> -Emil
Is downgrading to zlib 1.2.3 okay? Otherwise, can we add support to
not build the shader cache in the autoconf build?
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
