https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100073
--- Comment #2 from Darren Salt <bugs...@moreofthesa.me.uk> ---
This code is intended to be generic; it SHOULD work for other pairs such as
armel and aarch64 (though breakage will happen should you have more than one
32-bit ARM ABI in use on one system). As such, as it's written, it should not
be testing __i386__, __x86_64__ or similar macros, but it does need to test
__ILP32__.
(Aside: x32 code is 64-bit.)
Without optimisation, yes, the testing is effectively at run-time; however, the
values are constant. So in that sense, it's a small amount of bloat and
unreachable code.
FWIW, my implementation (which uses the ABI name from the architecture triplet)
is here:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/141891/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
