Are we better off just checking for cmst_active now? Since that's all we're checking
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 11:12 Edward O'Callaghan <funfunc...@folklore1984.net> wrote: > commit 4a88396 dropped 'PIPE_CAP_USER_INDEX_BUFFERS' however > this case was missed. > > Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <funfunc...@folklore1984.net> > --- > src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c > b/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c > index c3924a2..8a75859 100644 > --- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c > +++ b/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c > @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ NineDevice9_ctor( struct NineDevice9 *This, > /* Allocate upload helper for drivers that suck (from st pov ;). */ > > This->driver_caps.user_vbufs = GET_PCAP(USER_VERTEX_BUFFERS) && > !This->csmt_active; > - This->driver_caps.user_ibufs = GET_PCAP(USER_INDEX_BUFFERS) && > !This->csmt_active; > + This->driver_caps.user_ibufs = !This->csmt_active; > This->driver_caps.user_cbufs = GET_PCAP(USER_CONSTANT_BUFFERS); > This->driver_caps.user_sw_vbufs = > This->screen_sw->get_param(This->screen_sw, PIPE_CAP_USER_VERTEX_BUFFERS); > This->driver_caps.user_sw_cbufs = > This->screen_sw->get_param(This->screen_sw, PIPE_CAP_USER_CONSTANT_BUFFERS); > -- > 2.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
