Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes: > From: Emil Velikov <emil.vel...@collabora.com> > > The version tag used to nominate has bitten even experienced mesa > developers. Not to mention that it deviates from the one used in the > kernel leading to further confusion. > > Simplify things and omit it all together. > > Signed-off-by: Emil Velcro <emil.veli...@collabora.com> > --- > Another option would be to align it with the kernel one, but that could > bring even further confusion.
I like this a lot -- I'm usually just copy-and-pasting someone else's cc stable line, so I'll probably occasionally nominate my stuff for an inactive stable branch. I'm not too worried about patches accidentally applying to too-old code. FWIW, this is more or less how the kernel's stable branches have been working for me -- I write a "Fixes: <short sha1> short commit subject" line in the commit, and Greg cherry-picks it back to all stable branches since that sha1 that it applies to.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
