On 2 February 2017 at 02:33, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > The intent of the libdrm_driver version limits has always been to not > burden the "other" drivers with updating their libdrm unless really > necessary. Unfortunately the configure script erroneously only checked > the driver-specific bit and not the generic bit of libdrm as well. Fix > this. > Haven't checked this explicitly, but I'm leaning that at least one piece is broken. If you are to change this, you must ensure that things build with the numbers provided.
-Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev