On 2 February 2017 at 02:33, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> The intent of the libdrm_driver version limits has always been to not
> burden the "other" drivers with updating their libdrm unless really
> necessary. Unfortunately the configure script erroneously only checked
> the driver-specific bit and not the generic bit of libdrm as well. Fix
> this.
>
Haven't checked this explicitly, but I'm leaning that at least one
piece is broken.
If you are to change this, you must ensure that things build with the
numbers provided.

-Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to