On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:18:24PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On 17-01-23 15:32:32, Chad Versace wrote: > > On Fri 20 Jan 2017, Rafael Antognolli wrote: > > > I have tested this series with the branches that you mentioned, and with > > > piglit with the patches from my own branch: > > > > > > https://github.com/rantogno/piglit/tree/review/fences-v02 > > > > > > Everything seems to work fine. You can add: > > > > > > Tested-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antogno...@intel.com> > > > > > > I also have gone through these patches several times while they were > > > under development, and they look good to me. So if you disregard my > > > shallow knowledge of Mesa, you could add: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antogno...@intel.com> > > > > Thanks. I've added the rb's and tb's locally. > > So IMO, Rafael is a great person to review this. He's underselling his > knowledge > to his detriment. Is there something preventing pushing these patches?
I believe there's nothing technically blocking it from landing, but Chad wanted to push them only after the kernel patches had landed. Hi Chris, do we have everything we need now to have the kernel side to land? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
