Hi all, Here's a few small fixes/functionality improvements when dealing with LLVM.
Most notably the series adds "LLVM" string [when applicable] to the .get_name() callback for drivers that use draw. Thus developer can respond accordingly - be that "rebuild with LLVM or enjoy the bad performance" or otherwise to reports. We can go a step further and make both(?) configure and the callback produce more nagging message along the lines of "built w/o LLVM expect bad performance", if people prefer. With this in mind we can drop the LLVM requirement, which some builders/distros explicitly patch out. Let's be nice to each other and not force it onto them. What do you guys think ? Emil Emil Velikov (8): virgl: remove unused draw_context.h include llvmpipe: use draw_get_option_use_llvm() instead of open coding it softpipe: set softpipe_screen::use_llvm when draw is build with LLVM softpipe: let .get_name() append LLVM if built with LLVM i915g: use draw_get_option_use_llvm() instead of open coding it i915g: let .get_name() append LLVM if built with LLVM r300: let .get_name() append LLVM if built with LLVM nouveau: let .get_name() append LLVM if built with LLVM src/gallium/drivers/i915/i915_screen.c | 9 +++++++-- src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_screen.c | 4 ++-- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.c | 7 ++++++- src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_screen.c | 10 +++++++++- src/gallium/drivers/softpipe/sp_screen.c | 6 ++++++ src/gallium/drivers/virgl/virgl_screen.c | 1 - 6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
