We have a persistent mapping.  Don't map it a second time or try to
unmap it.  Just use the pointer.

This most likely would wreak havoc except that this code is unused
(it's only called from an if (0) debug block).

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
---
 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_program_cache.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_program_cache.c 
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_program_cache.c
index 8939fb110fd..44d9994de01 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_program_cache.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_program_cache.c
@@ -514,7 +514,8 @@ brw_print_program_cache(struct brw_context *brw)
    const struct brw_cache *cache = &brw->cache;
    struct brw_cache_item *item;
 
-   drm_intel_bo_map(cache->bo, false);
+   if (!brw->has_llc)
+      drm_intel_bo_map(cache->bo, false);
 
    for (unsigned i = 0; i < cache->size; i++) {
       for (item = cache->items[i]; item; item = item->next) {
@@ -524,5 +525,6 @@ brw_print_program_cache(struct brw_context *brw)
       }
    }
 
-   drm_intel_bo_unmap(cache->bo);
+   if (!brw->has_llc)
+      drm_intel_bo_unmap(cache->bo);
 }
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to