On 11/08/2011 12:30 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote: > Second, it would really help to clearly distinguish headers that are meant to > be used exclusive by C++ with a different suffix (e.g., .hpp). And leave .h > for headers that are meant for joint C/C++ consuption. > > Take e.g., ../glsl/program.h, are these supposed to be C functions or C++ > functions? There's no way to tell just from reading the headers. So it's not > clear if those type/functions should be inside extern "C" {..} or not. > > > Is this OK?
I agree. Pure C++ headers should have the .hpp extension. That would eliminate some unnecessary confusion. -- Chad Versace c...@chad-versace.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev