On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 01/11/2017 03:16 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Samuel Pitoiset >> <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 01/11/2017 12:47 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> We don't have to use lp_build_tgsi_soa_context::immediates at all just >>>> as we don't use lp_build_tgsi_soa_context::temps. >>> >>> >>> >>> You want to always allocate the array of immediates dynamically? And use >>> ctx->imms/ctx->imms_count like what we currently do for temps? >> >> >> Yes. > > > Ok. > >> >> Eventually we can get rid of si_shader_context::soa and replace it >> with its parent structure - bld_base, because we don't use much from soa. > > > That would require to move soa::addr and soa::outputs in si_shader_context > (after a quick look at the code).
Yeah that's the plan. Marek _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
