This will let VC4 do some ARM-specific optimizations while still having
the simulator build on x86.
---
I'm finishing building the series for doing NEON optimizations today,
but I wanted to get this out there for review since it touches shared
code.
I didn't replicate the 'case "$host_os"' for this check. Do we need
that? I'm planning on using gcc intrinsics for arm asm code, so it
doesn't seem host os dependent.
configure.ac | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d1ffb57f57e3..1fe8e2ed071c 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -763,6 +763,9 @@ if test "x$enable_asm" = xyes; then
;;
esac
;;
+ arm)
+ asm_arch=arm
+ ;;
sparc*)
case "$host_os" in
linux*)
@@ -777,6 +780,10 @@ if test "x$enable_asm" = xyes; then
DEFINES="$DEFINES -DUSE_X86_ASM -DUSE_MMX_ASM -DUSE_3DNOW_ASM
-DUSE_SSE_ASM"
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes, x86])
;;
+ arm)
+ DEFINES="$DEFINES -DUSE_ARM_ASM"
+ AC_MSG_RESULT([yes, arm])
+ ;;
x86_64|amd64)
DEFINES="$DEFINES -DUSE_X86_64_ASM"
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes, x86_64])
@@ -2683,6 +2690,7 @@ AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_COMMON_OSMESA, test "x$enable_osmesa"
= xyes -o \
AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_X86_ASM, test "x$asm_arch" = xx86 -o "x$asm_arch" =
xx86_64)
AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_X86_64_ASM, test "x$asm_arch" = xx86_64)
AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_SPARC_ASM, test "x$asm_arch" = xsparc)
+AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_ARM_ASM, test "x$asm_arch" = xarm)
AC_SUBST([NINE_MAJOR], 1)
AC_SUBST([NINE_MINOR], 0)
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
