On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:04:58 -0400, Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/10/20 Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:35:31 +0200, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> > > wrote: > >> On Mit, 2011-10-19 at 17:50 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > >> > So, Radeon maintainers, what do you think? And, does anyone else want > >> > to test it on the other drivers? I caught two bugs in my r300 testing > >> > (one too many lines cut in one r300 commit, and I had also removed the > >> > texsubimage code in an unrelated-to-the-series commit, but it regressed > >> > s3tc-texsubimage so I backed it out). > >> > >> I don't feel too strongly about it either way, but if you're going to do > >> this, you might as well remove the classic r300 and r600 drivers > >> altogether in favour of the Gallium based ones. > > > > I've pushed a branch to do so to r300-kill of my repo. People seemed > > even more excited about this than the DRI1 stuff, but everyone seemed to > > predicate it on DRI1 going away. I'm figuring I'd slip that series in > > after the initial "remove DRI1 screen setup" commit. > > > > Any explicit acks on DRI1, or complaints about my interpretation of acks > > on killing r300/r600? > > Unless there are any major objections from the *BSD, Solaris, or Linux > distro folks, I'm fine with it.
Thanks! In the absence of complaints, I'm planning on pushing this on Friday.
pgpbZCsFEtF3L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
