On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:45:15 -0600, Brian Paul <brian.e.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:10 PM, nobled <nob...@dreamwidth.org> wrote:
> > NULL as an error indicator is meaningless, since it will return NULL
> > on success anyway if the caller passes in zero as the image's address
> > and asks to calculate the offset of the first pixel. For example,
> > _mesa_validate_pbo_access() does this.
> >
> > This also matches the code in the non-GL_BITMAP codepath, which
> > already has an assert like this.
> >
> > v2: Per Brian Paul's review, remove the function call entirely
> > and tighten the assert to only accept the two formats compatible with
> > GL_BITMAP. They always have one component per pixel.
> 
> Looks good, thanks!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com>

Time to make an account and get commit access?

Attachment: pgptC4jIgGiGI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to