On 10 November 2016 at 20:42, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 November 2016 at 20:18, Kyriazis, George
> <george.kyria...@intel.com> wrote:
>> Emil,
>>
>> I've followed the approach of trying to localize the swr changes to where 
>> they belong in order to avoid "polluting" upper-level files.  If you're 
>> talking about modifying some of the files in the scons/ directory, I don't 
>> see a place where swr fits in, conceptually.
>>
> Yes that's what I was thinking/mentioned - shove the lot to scons/*
> but haven't looked to closely were exactly.
> Jose any ideas ?
>
>> I do agree that using the full SCons.Script.ARGUMENTS is clunky, but I don't 
>> want to pollute top-level files with driver-specific things (swr in this 
>> case).
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
> As long as Jose is happy with adding/using SCons.Script.ARGUMENTS for
> swr, it's all good.
>
In case I wasn't clear - don't let this [suggestions on how to make it
"perfect"] block any of your work. It's just an idea.

Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to