On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:58:26AM -0700, Rafael Antognolli wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 01:15:44PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Rafael Antognolli > > <rafael.antogno...@intel.com> wrote:
... > > Hey, thanks for this. I don't suppose you have a branch somewhere w/ > > the piglit tests? > > Ouch, I mentioned it on another email but should have mentioned it here > too. It's here: > > https://github.com/rantogno/piglit/tree/fences > > > I've rebased and pulled in Chad's squash patches (and also a squash > > patch based on the issues you pointed out), but not yet the i965 > > patches: > > > > https://github.com/freedreno/mesa/commits/wip-fence > > Awesome, I will check that one. Just an update: I did test that branch, and there was just one change needed for the piglit tests to work: https://github.com/rantogno/mesa/commit/c637f1ce404acaccaa920d37c52724c9d8093597 You can also check my last version of these tests (also submitted to the piglit list) here: https://github.com/rantogno/piglit/tree/review/fences-v02 The only test that I don't know how to do yet is to make sure that Mesa and the kernel are respecting an eglSyncWait for a native sync fence. eglClientWaitSyncKHR is already covered. Also I did test your series with kmscube and some other stuff too, and so far it's all behaving really well. I'm looking forward to see your patches get merged. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
