On 3 November 2016 at 17:12, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 16:21 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> I'm not a fan of keeping legacy stuff with only one (pretty useless) >> user. Not to mention that the glXGetDriverConfig plumbing is missing >> [in here]. But as you feel so strongly in keeping it ... > > Maybe I wasn't clear. I don't care at all about GetScreenDriver, the > one consumer is not in fact useful. Saying I "feel so strongly in > keeping it" is a complete misrepresentation, nothing in this series was > specifically about GetScreenDriver at all. >
" One user, xdriinfo(1), which is admittedly pretty useless. But the glvnd code in mesa definitely implements dispatch for it (libglvnd itself does not, but is not expected to). " Your earlier reply did not have ack/nack on the topic of dropping it, thus the above reads as a justification why one would wants to keep it. All I was saying "since we're (sort of) wiring GetScreenDriver can we just drop it all together ?" If you think that's good/bad idea, should be separate patch, etc. that's fine. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
