On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> nouveau supports PIPE_SHADER_CAP_SUBROUTINES and properly details with >> RET opcodes. The alternative is that the st lowers the whole thing >> into a loop which adds IMHO unnecessary complexity to the resulting >> code. Any reason not to leave that in place? > > It had already been disabled and probably broken too. If you have no > interest in fixing and using it within a reasonable time frame, there > is no reason for the code to be there.
What's broken about it? To the best of my knowledge, it's working fine. I'm specifically talking about RET (from the "MAIN" function), not subroutines in general. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
