Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 19:51:21 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
> On 12 October 2016 at 19:04, Tobias Droste <tdro...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 09:56:39 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
> >> > fi
> >> >
> >> > +if test "x$enable_opencl" = xyes; then
> >> > + llvm_check_version_for "3" "6" "0" "opencl"
> >> > +
> >> > + LLVM_COMPONENTS="${LLVM_COMPONENTS} all-targets ipo linker
> >> > instrumentation" + LLVM_COMPONENTS="${LLVM_COMPONENTS} irreader
> >> > option
> >> > objcarcopts profiledata" +fi
> >> > +
> >> > +dnl Check for Clang internal headers
> >> > +if test "x$enable_opencl" = xyes; then
> >>
> >> Nit: drop the second if test, yet preserve the comment ?
> >> Disclaimer: haven't looked if later patches depend on the split.
> >
> > This is a "just move" patch, that's why I didn't change anything.
> > But this whole section will be changed later (Patch 11) so it actually
> > doesn't matter.
>
> Patch 11... this hunks get moved once here and a second time in there.
> Just move it to the "top" from the start, fold the conditional and as
> you do further movement keep it in the same block ?
>
> Sure I suggested to keep things separate, but it sounds like we got
> from one end/extreme to the other.
> Emil
No at this point in time it sadly has to be below the other gallium stuff,
because it uses LLVM variables but I need it outside the LLVM config stuff to
have this function later without any code that throws errors.
(Forgot the mailing list again)
PS:
This is the reason I didn't want to split this stuff and have it build
correctly. There's a lot of stuff that needs to be in the right order to work.
That's also the reason the oCL stuff is here and not where it actually
belongs!
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
