On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:31:56PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Gary, I believe that nuking sysfs is perfectly reasonable but if there
> are any technical reasons/obstacles why it must stay please shout.
Yup, I agree with the removal. If I find any exceptions in the future
I may get in touch to reinstate the sysfs code or something like it,
but it does appear the libdrm handler covers all those cases anyway.
> Furthermore, if you and/or a fellow Gnu developers/users can prep some
> patches for mesa [1], libdrm [2] and/or other graphics stack packages
> that will be amazing.
I don't maintain those guix configs you cited and I'm not sure who
does, but I can investigate.
Thanks,
Gary.
--
Gary Wong g...@gnu.org http://www.cs.utah.edu/~gtw/
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
