On Friday, October 7, 2016 8:52:18 AM PDT Tapani Pälli wrote:
> Fixes following dEQP tests:
> 
>    
> dEQP-GLES31.functional.debug.negative_coverage.callbacks.atomic_counter.atomic_precision
>    
> dEQP-GLES31.functional.debug.negative_coverage.get_error.atomic_counter.atomic_precision
>    
> dEQP-GLES31.functional.debug.negative_coverage.log.atomic_counter.atomic_precision
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98131
> ---
>  src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp 
> b/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
> index 8cdb917..c3c8cef 100644
> --- a/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
> +++ b/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
> @@ -2585,6 +2585,20 @@ select_gles_precision(unsigned qual_precision,
>                            type->name);
>        }
>     }
> +
> +
> +   /* Section 4.1.7.3 (Atomic Counters) of the GLSL ES 3.10 spec says:
> +    *
> +    *    "The default precision of all atomic types is highp. It is an error 
> to
> +    *    declare an atomic type with a different precision or to specify the
> +    *    default precision for an atomic type to be lowp or mediump."
> +    */
> +   if (type->base_type == GLSL_TYPE_ATOMIC_UINT &&
> +       precision != ast_precision_high) {
> +      _mesa_glsl_error(loc, state,
> +                       "atomic_uint can only have highp precision 
> qualifier");
> +   }
> +
>     return precision;
>  }
>  
> 

Hrm, wouldn't this break for precision == ast_precision_none?

--Ken

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to