On 05/09/16 23:49, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Luke A. Guest <lagu...@archeia.com> wrote: >> >> On 05/09/16 18:41, Marek Olšák wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> So currently out-of-tree radv, reuses addrlib (by copying the all >>>> the files), and at least wants to share the register and family >>>> header files. >>>> >>>> This is a set of patches to just move those into a shared directory, >>>> in advance of proposing that radv goes into mainline at all. >>> While I'm not against merging radv, I'd like our (closed) Vulkan >>> driver to be considered the main and default driver after we open >>> source it. >>> >> When's that likely to be though? > I wish I knew that too. > Ok, but if the radv driver ends up getting there first, you cannot expect the developers to just wipe it when AMD finally bother to open their driver just so it can be considered the default? Seems strange.
Luke. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
