Iago Toral Quiroga <ito...@igalia.com> writes:

> ---
>  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4.cpp | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4.cpp 
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4.cpp
> index 829b7d3..88bf895 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4.cpp
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4.cpp
> @@ -1580,6 +1580,9 @@ vec4_visitor::dump_instruction(backend_instruction 
> *be_inst, FILE *file)
>     if (inst->force_writemask_all)
>        fprintf(file, " NoMask");
>  
> +   if (inst->exec_size == 4)
> +      fprintf(file, "%s", inst->group == 0 ? " 1N" : " 2N");
> +

In the FS back-end we do:

|   if (inst->exec_size != dispatch_width)
|         fprintf(file, "group%d ", inst->group);

Would it make sense to have the vec4 back-end behave the same way for
consistency? (with dispatch_width equal to 8)

>     fprintf(file, "\n");
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to