On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: > On 08/08/2016 09:38 AM, ⚛ wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: >>> I'm pretty sure this breaks ABI. Did you try using an unpatched libGL >>> with a patched *_dri.so (and vice-versa)? >> >> Can you be more specific? > > Eh... build Mesa. Save the libGL and *_dri.so. Apply patch. Build > again. Run applications with LD_PRELOAD and LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH (or > EGL_DRIVERS_PATH) set to mix the old and new.
- The changes to the data structures in the patch do not necessarily imply that mixing-unpatched-patched libs will fail because the alignment of fields might stay the same. - I looked into it a bit, but more time is required before I can send the next version of the patch (if required). I marked the patch as "deferred" at patchwork.freedesktop.org for now. PS: Patches 10474 10427 10418 at patchwork aren't controversial so it should be possible to review+merge them relatively quickly. It will allow me to move on. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
