On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote:
> Both branches are identical. Fixes a Coverity warning.
>
> CID: 1364155
>
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
> ---
> src/intel/vulkan/anv_cmd_buffer.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_cmd_buffer.c
> b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_cmd_buffer.c
> index 6256df8..ce4266f 100644
> --- a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_cmd_buffer.c
> +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_cmd_buffer.c
> @@ -358,10 +358,7 @@ anv_cmd_buffer_emit_state_base_address(struct
> anv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer)
> {
> switch (cmd_buffer->device->info.gen) {
> case 7:
> - if (cmd_buffer->device->info.is_haswell)
> - return gen7_cmd_buffer_emit_state_base_address(cmd_buffer);
> - else
> - return gen7_cmd_buffer_emit_state_base_address(cmd_buffer);
> + return gen7_cmd_buffer_emit_state_base_address(cmd_buffer);
> case 8:
> return gen8_cmd_buffer_emit_state_base_address(cmd_buffer);
> case 9:
> --
> 2.9.0
This was added in commit 6f613abc2b, which looks really sketchy.
The patch adds a prototype for
gen75_cmd_buffer_emit_state_base_address(), which I assume was
intended to be used in this if-statement, and the commit summary says
"Incidentally, this should fix MOCS settings for dynamic and surface
state on Haswell." but other than the useless is_haswell check your
patch removes it didn't touch anything related to Haswell.
Jason should really take a look. Clearly /something/ is wrong.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
