On 17 June 2016 at 22:22, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On 17 June 2016 at 21:12, Mike Gorchak <mike.gorchak....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Please understand me right, we are not talking about desktop hardware >> > and >> > libraries, only about embedded in case of GL ES. >> GLES hasn't been "embedded only" for a while I believe. > > > No, but Mike is 100% correct that looking at AMD and NVIDIA isn't sufficient > in the gles case. AMD doesn't matter (they don't do GLES) and NVIDIA is > only one vendor. If the majority of *other* vendors (and there are a lot of > them) export the symbols, that does mean something. > My ideas are the following: - First and foremost: Can we make things saner/more robust or is it too late [since most vendors are exporting the symbols] ? - Can we confirm that's the case for Linux platforms ?
I'm not trying to start a fight here, but to point out that "everybody's doing it" type of argument does not mean that "it" is a wise idea. IMHO one should establish exactly who "everybody" is (both vendors and platforms), consider for the consequences and then make a decision. Regards, Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
