On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Chad Versace <chad.vers...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat 11 Jun 2016, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > This commit switches clear colors to use #if's instead of a C if. This > > lets us properly handle SNB where the clear color field doesn't exist. > > --- > > src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c | 44 > +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c > b/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c > > index db90936..aa720d8 100644 > > --- a/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c > > +++ b/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c > > @@ -372,31 +372,31 @@ isl_genX(surf_fill_state_s)(const struct > isl_device *dev, void *state, > > } > > #endif > > > > - if (GEN_GEN <= 8) { > > - /* Prior to Sky Lake, we only have one bit for the clear color > which > > - * gives us 0 or 1 in whatever the surface's format happens to be. > > - */ > > - if (isl_format_has_int_channel(info->view->format)) { > > - for (unsigned i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > > - assert(info->clear_color.u32[i] == 0 || > > - info->clear_color.u32[i] == 1); > > - } > > - } else { > > - for (unsigned i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > > - assert(info->clear_color.f32[i] == 0.0f || > > - info->clear_color.f32[i] == 1.0f); > > - } > > +#if GEN_GEN >= 9 > > + s.RedClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[0]; > > + s.GreenClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[1]; > > + s.BlueClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[2]; > > + s.AlphaClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[3]; > > The gen9 block looks good. > > > +#elif GEN_GEN >= 7 > > + /* Prior to Sky Lake, we only have one bit for the clear color which > > + * gives us 0 or 1 in whatever the surface's format happens to be. > > + */ > > + if (isl_format_has_int_channel(info->view->format)) { > > + for (unsigned i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > > + assert(info->clear_color.u32[i] == 0 || > > + info->clear_color.u32[i] == 1); > > } > > - s.RedClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[0] != 0; > > - s.GreenClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[1] != 0; > > - s.BlueClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[2] != 0; > > - s.AlphaClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[3] != 0; > > } else { > > - s.RedClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[0]; > > - s.GreenClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[1]; > > - s.BlueClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[2]; > > - s.AlphaClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[3]; > > + for (unsigned i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > > + assert(info->clear_color.f32[i] == 0.0f || > > + info->clear_color.f32[i] == 1.0f); > > + } > > } > > + s.RedClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[0] != 0; > > + s.GreenClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[1] != 0; > > + s.BlueClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[2] != 0; > > + s.AlphaClearColor = info->clear_color.u32[3] != 0; > > This block looks broken, both pre- and post-patch. Is this code actually > used anywhere in the Vulkan driver? I expect not, as the driver doesn't > use the CCS yet. > > In the for loop, the code asserts clear_color.f32[i] is 0.0f or 1.0f. > I believe the assignment expressions should also use f32, not u32. That > is, > > s.RedClearColor = info->clear_color.f32[0] != 0.0f; > s.GreenClearColor = info->clear_color.f32[1] != 0.0f; > s.BlueClearColor = info->clear_color.f32[2] != 0.0f; > s.AlphaClearColor = info->clear_color.f32[3] != 0.0f; > Right. That's probably more correct but given that 0.0f is 0u as bits, I don't know if it actually matters. Maybe for -0?
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev