Le 06/06/2016 à 11:19, Emil Velikov a écrit : > Fully agree behind that one. > > On the overall topic here is a (related) idea I've had lying around: > - Contact distribution maintainers to patch their glamor packages as > far back as possible. > Having a mesa-maintainers ML or alike might help, they are likely to > miss this in mesa-dev, plus pinging individuals does not scale. > - Decide on transition period, where we'll have a) the patch reverted > or b) a glamor hack in place. > - Transition period is over - patch is back in/hack is out. > > The communication medium can be used to get the maintainers attention > to other topics that directly concern them. They could also voice > their like/dislike towards X and Y. >
This could be with the mesa release announcement with a link to the xorg patch? > How does the above sound ? > Emil > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > -- Laurent Carlier http://www.archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
