On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Iago Toral Quiroga <ito...@igalia.com> wrote: > These are not supported by the fp64 spec though, so they are not really > necessary. There are, however, other cases of opcodes that are not > supported by fp64 and where we have provied a double-precision > implementation anyway. Previous discussion in the mailing list suggested > that we might want to do these if they were easy to provide. > --- > > If we finally decide against this, we should probably remove double-precision > handling in sin/cos and pow too.
Ian, Jason: I've read the other thread, but I don't understand why we'd want these. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
