On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Jose Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com> wrote: >> On 17/05/16 22:43, Rob Clark wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm in the process of setting up a CI job to track Android builds of >>>> mesa master (ATM merging in a branch of commits needed to build which >>>> are not yet upstream). It is mostly working now though I'm still >>>> tweaking the setup a bit. It is built on AOSP master branch as well. >>>> >>>> Build errors/warnings are published here: >>>> >>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/robher-aosp/lastBuild/parsed_console/ >>>> >>>> I can add anyone who would like to get emails of errors. >>> >>> >>> Great idea! >>> >>> I think appveyor (windows CI build) just spams all of mesa-dev for >>> build breaks.. and I guess I don't see a reason not to do that for >>> android CI builds as well. >>> >> >> What do you mean by "spams"? Do you mean to say the AppVeyor traffic is too >> much? >> > > only meant that it sends it to the whole list (and I'm not saying that > is a bad thing).. don't read too much into my choice of words ;-) > >> >> FYI, the notification settings are set such that AppVeyor does _not_ email >> for _every_ failure. It emails when the build goes from passing -> failed, >> or failed -> passed. >> >> So, if the Windows build breaks while all Windows maitainers are on >> vacation, there should be no spam. >> >> The only situation where there's spam is when there are intermetting build >> failures. We've seen a few of those (due to infrastructure issues), but >> thankfully not too often. >> >> >> I recommend similar notification settings. Too many emails: everybody >> ignores, or will setup rules to hide those emails. No emails: nobody >> notices. >> > > yeah, that is a good point.. not too familiar w/ Jenkins but if it has > similar settings, that sounds like a good idea..
It does. Right now I have it set to email on every build (3 times a day), so I'm not quite ready to spam everyone. First, I'd like to get to a passing state and give it some time to make sure it is stable (i.e. little/no AOSP master related breakage). Rob _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev