In lieu of GL3.txt being updated, is there some way for me to get an
idea about what OpenSWR supports without digging through the code /
building tests?

FWIW, as an outsider I use mesamatrix to get a very nice overview on
what the different renderers support. I consider that valuable.

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> It is whatever you (i.e. driver maintainer) want it to be. GL3.txt is
> mainly for coordinating development and letting people know who's
> working on what (less so of late though). If you plan on exposing GL
> 4.0+, it can be a nice TODO list. Otherwise there's not an immense
> amount of value.
>
>   -ilia
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Rowley, Timothy O
> <timothy.o.row...@intel.com> wrote:
>> What is the criteria for marking an extension “done”?  Passing some 
>> percentage (all?) of relevant piglit tests?
>>
>> -Tim
>>
>>> On May 10, 2016, at 10:31 PM, Andrew J <andj2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there any possibility that OpenSWR can be added to GL3.txt [1] so
>>> others can get an idea of what things OpenSWR supports?
>>>
>>> GL3.txt is what mesamatrix [2] uses, so adding OpenSWR to GL3.txt
>>> would add it there as well.
>>>
>>> [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/tree/docs/GL3.txt
>>> [2] http://mesamatrix.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-dev mailing list
>> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to