On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 8 May 2016 at 20:05, Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote: >> On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 12:15:00PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: >>> I'd already suggested the same, but it never got pushed: >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-May/115501.html >>> >>> So I guess we can add the Tested-by from the other, for whichever gets >>> pushed. >> >> Was there a reason you didn't push it yet? > > Was just waiting for something a bit stronger than an ack, I guess?
An "Acked-by" from the author of the reverted commit seems as strong as can be had. The concept of giving a "Reviewed-by" for a revert seems a bit absurd to me. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
