On 27 April 2016 at 10:31, Jose Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com> wrote:
> On 27/04/16 09:11, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>
>> On 04/26/2016 08:55 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>>
>>> Ran `make check` inside src/glx to verify everything compiles and links
>>> correctly.
>>>
>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95158
>>
>>
>> In the future, please use
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95158
>>
>> It helps various scripts operate correctly.
>
>
> I recall reading another email on this list saying that (at least one
> script, the one used to check for crossport candidates) could pick up the
> plain bugzilla URLs just as well.
>
> And I got impression it was equally good to use plain URLs, and given I'm
> never sure if one should use "Bugzilla: " or "Bug: " or whatever, it seems
> more reliable than riskying mistyping the header.
>
> So, that's not the case then?
>
The scripts have (for a long time) been able to pick those without the
"Bugzilla:" tags.
While It's great to have them, it's not a deal breaker.

On the odd occasion people add the link to bugzilla attachment I try
to correct it.

Thanks
Emil
P.S. Fun stuff happens when people mistype freedekstop in the
mesa-stable tag ;-)
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to