From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com>
Yes, that flag is really needed.
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_draw.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_draw.c
b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_draw.c
index 40cad50..8f4eba4 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_draw.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_draw.c
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ void si_emit_cache_flush(struct si_context *si_ctx, struct
r600_atom *atom)
* doesn't seem to work reliably. Since the bug doesn't affect
* correctness (it only does more work than necessary) and
* the performance impact is likely negligible, there is no plan
- * to fix it.
+ * to add a workaround for it.
*/
if (sctx->flags & SI_CONTEXT_INV_ICACHE)
@@ -628,7 +628,6 @@ void si_emit_cache_flush(struct si_context *si_ctx, struct
r600_atom *atom)
if (sctx->flags & SI_CONTEXT_INV_GLOBAL_L2) {
cp_coher_cntl |= S_0085F0_TC_ACTION_ENA(1);
- /* TODO: this might not be needed. */
if (sctx->chip_class >= VI)
cp_coher_cntl |= S_0301F0_TC_WB_ACTION_ENA(1);
}
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
