I noticed using one synthetic benchmark a sequence where hiz depth
operations are run first followed by a color buffer clear. In such
case there is a difference between blorp and meta clear where meta
configures L3 but blorp doesn't. I didn't see any problems in
practise without the configure but this is the right thing to do.
Signed-off-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com>
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_blorp.cpp | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_blorp.cpp
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_blorp.cpp
index ef96ec5..b85a6a5 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_blorp.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_blorp.cpp
@@ -802,6 +802,7 @@ gen7_blorp_exec(struct brw_context *brw,
params->dst.num_samples > 1 ?
(1 << params->dst.num_samples) - 1 : 1);
gen6_blorp_emit_state_base_address(brw, params);
+ gen7_l3_state.emit(brw);
gen6_blorp_emit_vertices(brw, params);
gen7_blorp_emit_urb_config(brw);
if (params->use_wm_prog) {
--
2.5.5
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
