-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/2011 10:02 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 07/17/2011 12:29 PM, vljn wrote:
>
>> +class box:public exec_node
>
> For the record, I'm going to NAK with extreme prejudice any patch that
> includes this crap. I'm not trying to be a jerk, but I've explained at
> least twice why this is unacceptable.
Blarg. But I am having a case of the stupid Mondays. I didn't notice
that this message was over a month old. Please, ignore this.
>
>> +{
>> +public:
>> + void* content;
>> +
>> + box(void* c):content(c)
>> + {
>> +
>> + }
>> +};
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk5bxloACgkQX1gOwKyEAw8w1wCfWlfQuOt1WoaTAbo3A4+bqgnQ
po0AnRdUFcfkTBIWwyWV32lrSDx4fwPU
=h/an
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
