On 12/03/16 00:16, Anuj Phogat wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.pho...@gmail.com>
Any reason to not just move the slice assert at line 243 as part of the
checks of check_map_teximage?
> ---
> src/mesa/swrast/s_texture.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/swrast/s_texture.c b/src/mesa/swrast/s_texture.c
> index 9ccd0e3..6ea7b6c 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/swrast/s_texture.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/swrast/s_texture.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ _swrast_free_texture_image_buffer(struct gl_context *ctx,
> */
> static void
> check_map_teximage(const struct gl_texture_image *texImage,
> - GLuint slice, GLuint x, GLuint y, GLuint w, GLuint h)
> + GLuint x, GLuint y, GLuint w, GLuint h)
> {
>
> if (texImage->TexObject->Target == GL_TEXTURE_1D)
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ _swrast_map_teximage(struct gl_context *ctx,
> GLint stride, texelSize;
> GLuint bw, bh;
>
> - check_map_teximage(texImage, slice, x, y, w, h);
> + check_map_teximage(texImage, x, y, w, h);
>
> if (!swImage->Buffer) {
> /* Either glTexImage was called with a NULL <pixels> argument or
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
