On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 February 2016 at 01:17, Timothy Arceri > <timothy.arc...@collabora.com> wrote: >> From: Timothy Arceri <t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> >> >> --- >> docs/devinfo.html | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/docs/devinfo.html b/docs/devinfo.html >> index 8ebf80f..ed9eb9b 100644 >> --- a/docs/devinfo.html >> +++ b/docs/devinfo.html >> @@ -162,6 +162,24 @@ components. >> perhaps, in very trivial cases.) >> </ul> >> >> +<h3>Git Tips</h3> >> + >> +<ul> >> +<li>Test for build breakage between patches e.g last 8 commits. >> +<pre> >> + git rebase -i --exec="make -j4" HEAD~8 >> +</pre> >> +<li>Sets the default mailing address for your repo. >> +<pre> >> + git config --local sendemail.to mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >> +</pre> >> +<li> Add version to subject line of patch series in this case for the last 8 >> +commits before sending. >> +<pre> >> + git send-email --subject-prefix="PATCH v4" HEAD~8 > > Fwiw some of us tend to use the shorter version: > > $ git send-email -v4 -8 > > Whether we want it or not I prefer if others decise.
Since I didn't know either of those arguments, and Ken just replied and suggested one but not the other, it seems valuable to note them instead :) _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
