On Monday, February 1, 2016 10:50:31 AM PST Juha-Pekka Heikkila wrote: > On 23.01.2016 01:22, Nicolai Hähnle wrote: > > On 22.01.2016 16:02, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > >> On Friday, January 22, 2016 12:09:18 PM PST Nicolai Hähnle wrote: > >>> On 22.01.2016 02:53, Jordan Justen wrote: > >>>> Juha-Pekka found this back in May 2015: > >>>> <1430915727-28677-1-git-send-email-juhapekka.heikk...@gmail.com> > >>>> > >>>> From the discussion, obviously it would be preferable to make > >>>> > >>>> ralloc_size no longer return zeroed memory, but Juha-Pekka found that > >>>> it would break Mesa. > > Hi, just to comment here. I did make set of patches which fixed all the > breaking places for Mesa. Tapani then pointed the problem I can only > test my patches on Intel HW, more so I have only SNB and IVB on my desk. > > Making real fix here would be source of all kind of really nasty bugs on > different HW for some time to come thus I dropped the ball on the fixes. > In the end for Mesa on Intel HW there was not so much to fix but to find > all the correct places to fix require running lot of Valgrind. > > I seem to have missed the patch where I was cc'd, sorry about that. > > /Juha-Pekka
I don't recall seeing those patches on the mailing list...did I just miss them? Or, are you planning to send them out? --Ken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
