Can't see any serious issues here and a non-verified `working' instance
of
GPUPerfStudio is sure better than a crashing one!
This series is,
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallag...@alterapraxis.com>
On 2016-02-04 00:52, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
Hi,
this bunch of patches meets GPUPerfStudio half-way in supporting the
timing
features on CI+ hardware. The latest version of GPUPerfStudio is
required.
With these patches, GPUPerfStudio should recognize our driver as
supported
and offer its frame profiling features without crashing. It should also
report reasonable numbers in the profile. However, I haven't fully
validated the reported numbers, so while I'd like to get this merged
now,
it should still be considered as somewhat experimental. Please review.
Thanks,
Nicolai
--
.../drivers/radeon/r600_perfcounter.c | 38 +++---
src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600_query.c | 80 ++++++++++-
src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600_query.h | 32 ++---
.../drivers/radeonsi/si_perfcounter.c | 121 +++++++++++++----
4 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
