From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com>
I'm not sure about the consequences of this bug, but it's definitely
dangerous.
This applies to SI, CIK, VI.
Cc: 11.0 11.1 <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org>
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c
b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c
index 35b226f..8ff70b4 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c
@@ -1317,6 +1317,7 @@ static bool si_update_spi_tmpring_size(struct si_context
*sctx)
si_get_max_scratch_bytes_per_wave(sctx);
unsigned scratch_needed_size = scratch_bytes_per_wave *
sctx->scratch_waves;
+ unsigned spi_tmpring_size;
int r;
if (scratch_needed_size > 0) {
@@ -1386,8 +1387,12 @@ static bool si_update_spi_tmpring_size(struct si_context
*sctx)
assert((scratch_needed_size & ~0x3FF) == scratch_needed_size &&
"scratch size should already be aligned correctly.");
- sctx->spi_tmpring_size = S_0286E8_WAVES(sctx->scratch_waves) |
- S_0286E8_WAVESIZE(scratch_bytes_per_wave >> 10);
+ spi_tmpring_size = S_0286E8_WAVES(sctx->scratch_waves) |
+ S_0286E8_WAVESIZE(scratch_bytes_per_wave >> 10);
+ if (spi_tmpring_size != sctx->spi_tmpring_size) {
+ sctx->spi_tmpring_size = spi_tmpring_size;
+ sctx->emit_scratch_reloc = true;
+ }
return true;
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
