On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Dec 31, 2015 9:32 AM, "Matt Turner" <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaeh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > For Gallium-based drivers, this is required for receiving shader >> > information >> > via debug messages. >> > --- >> >> But that's a Gallium bug, right? >> >> Ilia sent a similar patch, and in the discussion I think we decided >> that what run.c is doing is perfectly fine. > > It's not a bug at all. Behavioural difference from i965 though. I was happy > to let the matter drop as I was the sole user of it. Sounds like there are > going to be more now, so this has to be addressed one way or the other.
Could you summarize what that difference is? > My key requirement is that the solution we arrive at allows nouveau to only > perform additional work for these messages if there's someone listening. That sounds like reasonable. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
