On Dec 14, 2015 3:34 PM, "Ian Romanick" <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: > > From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com> > > nir/nir.h: In function 'nir_src_for_ssa': > nir/nir.h:552:4: warning: missing initializer for field 'use_link' of 'nir_src' > [-Wmissing-field-initializers] > nir_src src = NIR_SRC_INIT; > ^ > In file included from nir/nir.c:28:0: > nir/nir.h:508:21: note: 'use_link' declared here > struct list_head use_link; > ^ > > Number of total warnings in my build reduced from 2329 to 1932 > (reduction of 397).
Is there some reason why you're building with extra warnings? Last I looked, all of NIR compiles with zero warnings with default flags so the "removes compiler warnings" argument falls flat when the code is perfectly well-defined. What utility does building with -wextra actually provide? If this serves no purpose other than alleviating your personal annoyance with your preferred extra flags, then I'm going to have to nak it. I'm not being territorial, I just don't see any point in adding complexity for the sake of -wextra. --Jason
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
