On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 December 2015 at 17:46, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On 7 December 2015 at 15:09, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hello list, >>>>> >>>>> The candidate for the Mesa 11.0.7 is now available. Currently we have: >>>>> - 43 queued >>>>> - 24 nominated (outstanding) >>>>> - and 1 rejected/obsolete patches >>>>> >>>>> Nominated (24) >>>>> ============== >>>>> >>>>> Ilia Mirkin (6): >>>>> freedreno/a4xx: support lod_bias >>>>> freedreno/a4xx: fix 5_5_5_1 texture sampler format >>>>> freedreno/a4xx: point regid to "red" even for alpha-only rb formats >>>>> nvc0/ir: fold postfactor into immediate >>>>> nv50/ir: deal with loops with no breaks >>>>> nv50/ir: fix DCE to not generate 96-bit loads >>>> >>>> Any particular reason to hold these up? They're all fixing real >>>> issues, and most were pushed quite a while ago. >>>> >>> The nouveau ones haven't landed in master (as of a few days ago) while >>> the freedreno ones are missing the 11.0 note. Was meaning to confirm >>> on the latter ones (if we do want them for 11.0), as at least one of >>> them did not pick cleanly. >> >> The freedreno ones all went in before the 11.1 branchpoint, thus no >> reason for the extra version tag. > Ouch I see what's happening here. I'll tweak things on my end to check > for "date merged in master" as opposed to "sent to the ML"
Well presumably my changes hit the ML before I pushed them to master... I hope. Or perhaps I never even sent them to ML... I probably got an IRC ack from Rob and pushed. For deciding the versions to cherry-pick something, you definitely need to look at its location in the tree (don't look at any dates, that's all BS anyways, look at commit child/parent relationships... git tag --contains is your friend =] ) > >> The nouveau ones landed nearly a >> week ago (Dec 2 from the looks of it). >> > > nv50/ir: fix DCE to not generate 96-bit loads > CommitDate: Thu Dec 3 23:02:57 2015 -0500 > > vs > > Top of 11.0 > CommitDate: Thu Dec 3 18:54:25 2015 +0000 > > I.e. missed by a few hours. And yes I was meaning to send this (and > 11.1) earlier, although relocating ate a bit more time than expected > :-\ No worries, exceptional circumstances will happen. Cheers, -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
