On 03.12.2015 06:01, Jose Fonseca wrote: > On 02/12/15 03:39, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 02.12.2015 07:06, Jose Fonseca wrote: >>> On 28/11/15 21:06, Emil Velikov wrote: >>>> On 25 November 2015 at 07:20, Jose Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> BTW, I setup Mesa with Appveyor (like Travis for Windows) >>>>> >>>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/jrfonseca/mesa >>>>> >>>>> I'll try to get that going and commited too. >>>>> >>>> As a person who has broken the Windows build on an occasion or two, >>>> yes please. >>>> >>>>> The nice thing about Appveyor is that it can clone the git from >>>>> anywhere, >>>>> not just GitHub. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Would it be OK to have email notifications to mesa-commits? >>>>> >>>> I'm wondering if mesa-dev wouldn't be more suitable. Not many of us >>>> (or is it just me?) don't follow mesa-commits. >>> >>> I'm OK either way. >>> >>> >>> Whichever list we choose, we need to whitelist emails from >>> no-re...@appveyor.com somehow. I don't know the procedure for that. >> >> A list administrator can add a subscription for that address with >> delivery of list posts disabled. > > Great. > > Per http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev it looks > you're one of the admins! Could you please add no-re...@appveyor.com?
Done. >>>> One thing no one mentioned is that one can automatically feed the >>>> results from Travis-CI/github into Coverity. I know Vinson has been >>>> doing the latter, although I'm not sure how much of it is automated. >>> >>> Yes, but Coverity recommend (ie ask) not to do so on every commit. >>> >>> Clang and MSVC have static analyzers too. I've been running them. But >>> to be honest, running them all the time is not enough -- it takes effort >>> to actually act on issues, resolving them / whitelisting them. And I'm >>> afraid I don't had the time. The bulk is false negatives. >> >> FWIW, I think you mean false positives here. > > I know it should be false _something_, but I always hesitate on which to > use. :) False positive means that the static analyzer reports a problem, but in fact there is no problem. False negative means there is a problem, but the static analyzer doesn't report it. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
