On 12/ 2/15 01:04 AM, Roland Mainz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Alan Coopersmith
<alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote:
On 12/ 1/15 03:07 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93189
---
configure.ac | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 4016871..b6680d0 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -197,6 +197,13 @@ if test "x$GCC" = xyes -a "x$acv_mesa_CLANG" = xno;
then
fi
fi
+dnl We don't support building Mesa with Sun C compiler
+dnl https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93189
+AC_CHECK_DECL([__SUNPRO_C], [SUNCC=yes], [SUNCC=no])
+if test "x$SUNCC" = xyes; then
+ AC_MSG_ERROR([Building with Sun C compiler is not supported, use GCC
instead.])
+fi
+
dnl Check for compiler builtins
AX_GCC_BUILTIN([__builtin_bswap32])
AX_GCC_BUILTIN([__builtin_bswap64])
Acked-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com>
Just curious: Why ?
Because Mesa developers continue to use extensions & syntax that Studio does
not support, and no one is putting in the effort to rewrite the Mesa code to
work with Studio and still be maintainable by people without Studio access.
We've built Mesa for Solaris with gcc for a while, so this won't impact us,
and no one else seems to want Studio support enough to make it work.
There's a half dozen bugs in the Mesa bugzilla for non-portable code that
breaks on Studio that have been filed recently that this closes.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
