On 08/02/2011 11:27 AM, Brian Paul wrote: > On 08/01/2011 12:38 PM, Bryan Cain wrote: >> Since Mesa 7.11 is released now, I figure it's time to discuss merging >> the glsl-to-tgsi branch to master again. The translator is more mature >> than last time. There are no regressions that I know of on any driver. >> The code generation has improved so that it's the same as or better than >> ir_to_mesa in almost every case. >> >> It also will still emit TGSI integer opcodes if you change >> ctx->GLSLVersion from 120 to 130 in st_extensions.c. Driver developers >> can use this to implement these opcodes in their drivers, since they >> will be needed for GLSL 1.30 eventually. >> >> Are there any objections to merging it to master now? If there aren't, >> I'll revise some of the commit messages for correctness and wrap long >> lines since cgit doesn't do that automatically, then merge it after >> getting approval. > > Sounds OK to me. > > I was just skimming over the new stuff - it looks like > create_color_map_texture() is duplicated in two files and could be > shared. > > -Brian
Yes, where should the function go and what header should it be declared in? It appears to me that none of the functions in st_atom_*.c are declared directly in header files. Bryan _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
