On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:43:37 -0700, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> 
wrote:
> On 05/27/2011 08:58 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > This was just a duplicate of no_rast=true driconf option, which is
> > relatively standard across drivers.
> > ---
> >   src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c |    3 ---
> >   1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> I strongly approve of gutting this code.  I was a bit surprised to see 
> "conformance_mode" still exists for a few files in intel/ or i915/.  Is 
> there a reason to keep that (I'm skeptical), or is it just that you 
> haven't done it yet/need to dig out Pineview hardware to test with?

Just didn't go digging it out and explaining it there.

Attachment: pgp2Ud8fhHMjD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to