> I don't see a bug filed related to dri2FlushFrontBuffer() but I see > one for dri2InvalidateBuffers(). Don't know if they're related. You > should file a bug for the issue you're having in dri2 with details on > how to reproduce it.
I just filed https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37253 Corbin, I CC'd you on it. > > What I really would like is to know a criterion that I can use to > > tell when that Gallium bug is fixed. Like a Gallium version number > > that I could read from the GL_RENDERER string, for example. > > We recently added the git commit ID to the version string (but only if > Mesa's built in a git repo). Would that help? As Gonsolo said, non-monotonicity is a big problem. If you're going to make a release shortly after fixing this bug anyways, I will just use the corresponding (Mesa or Gallium) x.y version number; otherwise a YYYYMMDD date or monotonic revision number could work. > > Hopefully someone can look at the bugs you've hit, get them fixed soon > and get a new Mesa release out with a version you can test against. Thanks! Benoit _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
