On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon TURNEY <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk> wrote: > On 27/04/2011 11:39, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote: >>> Alternatively, the configuration check could be made more complex to avoid >>> using this flag is the target isn't ELF or using the flag generates a >>> warning >> >> You could add -Werror to the CFLAGS used for the visibility test since >> any host that's throwing warnings for something so simple probably has >> issues with visibility. Something like: >> >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> index 8989c2b..ec662a3 100644 >> --- a/configure.ac >> +++ b/configure.ac >> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ if test "x$GCC" = xyes; then >> save_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS" >> AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether $CC supports -fvisibility=hidden]) >> VISIBILITY_CFLAGS="-fvisibility=hidden" >> - CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $VISIBILITY_CFLAGS" >> + CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $VISIBILITY_CFLAGS -Werror" >> AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()], AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]), >> [VISIBILITY_CFLAGS=""; AC_MSG_RESULT([no])]); >> >> Does that do the right thing? > > Yes, this works, and in fact this was the approach I initially tried, and > seems more elegant. > > However, I was concerned about false negatives. As far as I can tell, nothing > guarantees that the test program compiled by AC_LANG_PROGRAM() compiles > without warnings, only without errors, so using -Werror might cause this test > to fail for reasons unrelated to -fvisibility. > > Looking at this a bit more, though, a bit of googling seems to indicate we > wouldn't be the first to use this construction, so perhaps it's ok :-)
Yeah, I didn't say, but that's what I was worried about, too. On the other hand, what we're trying to compile is a bunch of defines then: int main () { ; return 0; } I'd hope we can do that without warnings. I'm fine if we don't feel like messing with that now and would rather just blacklist cygwin. -- Dan _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev